Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Pornography destroys lots of marriages, and harms lof people in terrible ways. How can nudists pretend it doesn't matter?<P>Only Native Residents may post here.

Moderators: jochanaan, MatthewNeal, jimmy, natman, Senior Moderator, Moderators

Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby natman » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:50 pm

Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?
http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/nefarious-ag ... -naked-tv/

When contestants on the TV reality series “Utopia” stripped down, the Fox Broadcasting Company advertised – on digital billboards, no less – fuzzed out photos of the naked cast to draw attention to its program.

“Utopia,” in turn, became only the latest in a growing trend of television programs to feature nudity, joining VH1′s “Dating Naked,” the Discovery Channel’s “Naked and Afraid” and even TLC’s “Buying Naked,” all of which have debuted since June 2013.

Despite the obviously voyeuristic allure, however, these “Naked” programs aren’t scoring with audiences. “Utopia,” for example, premiered with 4.63 million viewers, only to lose nearly half that many in its second week before tumbling down to 1.52 million viewers by Sept. 19. “Dating Naked,” similarly, has struggled to stay above one million watchers on average.

“We focused closely on the ‘Dating Naked’ show on VH1, and the ratings on this one are absolutely abysmal,” Dan Isett, director of communications and policy for the Parents Television Council, told WND. “But it still remained on the air, even when they could get better ratings for reruns of network shows.

“Is there some audience for material like that?” he asked. “Sure, but it pales in comparison to the audience for more worthwhile, family-friendly, wholesome fare.”

Why are TV networks suddenly airing “Naked” shows? Sound off in the WND Poll.

If the ratings aren’t there, however, why, in the money-making, ratings-driven business of entertainment, are television networks pushing the envelope with blatant nudity?

“I think that’s really the question,” Isett said. “We often hear from the entertainment industry that it’s all about money: ‘We just do this because the audience wants it.’ This trend really cuts against that grain. There’s very minimal audience for any of this stuff.”

Ryan Dobson, son of Dr. James Dobson and vice president of broadcast for Family Talk, suggested there may be more of an agenda behind networks pushing “Naked” TV shows than just money.

“Ted Baehr from Movieguide.org talks about this, that in general, movies are all about profits,” Dobson told WND, “but TV shows, while money is still a Top 5 motivation, there’s still an ideology that’s being taught.

“The ‘Naked’ programs, the ‘Real Housewives’ of whatever, you watch those programs, and you see how people relate to each other. It’s teaching people something,” Dobson continued. “If you’re not having these knock-down, drag-out, screaming fights with your husband, then apparently you don’t have ‘passion’ in your life, and they’re teaching people to behave this way.

“Even Disney programs, where the kids speak so disrespectfully to their parents, “he continued, “if you play that in the background long enough, over time, parents think that’s how kids talk to parents – but it’s not; it’s how scripted TV program children talk to the their TV parents.”

WND’s David Kupelian, author of “The Marketing of Evil,” argues pop culture has been the knife itself on the cutting edge of transforming societal norms.

“Naked reality TV shows are basically soft-core porn and are helping drag Americans’ minds and morals ever further into the gutter,” Kupelian says. “The reality-show industry has found a way to give us R-rated frontal nudity in primetime TV. Pixelating body parts isn’t equivalent to putting clothes on these show participants – the viewer knows they are naked, and that in itself is degrading and corrupting, especially since the show’s producers know it’s human nature for viewers’ minds to fill in the missing details.

140926marketingofevilcover“In “‘The Marketing of Evil’ I show how popular culture operates on the principle of always lowering standards – always making their offerings more shocking, more explicit, more sexual, more degrading.”

Discover how corruption is sold to the public in the name of “freedom” in the eye-opening book, “The Marketing of Evil,” from the WND Superstore now!

Isett and Dobson also suggested viewers should consider the people producing the “Naked” programming.

“My personal opinion is that Hollywood values being ‘cool,’” Isett told WND. “And that’s what gets you into dinner parties; that’s what gets you buzz in the entertainment media. It’s not always what builds you an audience and makes you money – what’s important is the acceptance of your peers. And when your peers believe all this stuff is terrific and there should be more of it, that’s what drives the boat.”

Dobson related the story of comedian Greg Behrendt, who was a consultant on the TV show “Sex and the City” and author of the book “He’s Just Not that into You,” which later inspired a movie of the same name.

“Behrendt talks about being the only straight male as a writer on ‘Sex and the City,’ that it was otherwise all women and gay men. That’s where his book came about, because they were stunned to hear the opinion of a straight male. They had no idea this is how men thought,” Behrendt said. “And if you really watch the women on ‘Sex and the City,’ they don’t act like women, they act like gay men. The mentality they have about their sexual encounters and this whole ‘empowerment’ idea that ‘we can have sex without emotions’ – that’s how gay men act, that’s not how women act. Women don’t behave that way.”

Or perhaps, Isett theorized, networks are churning out “Naked” TV because they’re “simply out of ideas.”

“You’ve seen a trend toward shows predicated on the nudity of contestants just over the last year or so – I think it’s further evidence of Hollywood’s lack of ideas,” Isett told WND. “When you have a compelling story that is told well and well produced, you will always have a successful entertainment product. Instead of going that route, doing something that will last and is of value, what you’re seeing too often is this downward trend in material.”

“It’s an indication of how desperate television executives have become in pushing the envelope to attract viewers,” added Bryan Fischer, director of issue analysis for the American Family Association. “It’s also a sign of creative bankruptcy – if you’ve got an idea that’s actually good enough to engage viewers, you don’t have to inject gratuitous nudity in there to make it work.”

Fischer further condemned the net effect of “Naked” programming on society.

“It’s a disturbing trend and an indication of how alarmingly sexualized our culture has become,” Fischer told WND. “These programs are deceptive and socially irresponsible. In real life, the most satisfying forms of sexual expression take place in private between a husband and wife who love each other and are committed to each other. These programs don’t exactly reinforce that ideal.”

“My dad wrote extensively about the steps of intimacy, and we’ve jumped over all of those, straight to nudity,” Dobson added. “In the ‘Naked Dating’ program and in ‘Naked and Afraid,’ you get strangers whose first encounter is buck naked.”

“Where do we go from here?” Isett asked. “The only thing left at this point is hardcore pornography. Are we going to start seeing pornography on basic cable? You already see that on premium cable, like HBO and Showtime, but that’s a different animal, because when a family subscribes to HBO, you know what you’re getting and you have the ability to pay for that or not. It’s different when you’re talking basic cable, because consumers and families are forced into a huge bundle of programming. In order to get access to Disney Channel or watch a football game, they’re forced to subsidize lots of material like what we’re describing.

“People should be able to pick and choose what’s coming into their home in the first place,” Isett said. “The question is, why are millions of families and parents forced to subsidize that kind of stuff?”

Isett also told WND, however, that people don’t have to travel to New York City or Hollywood to put an end to this kind of programming.

“There are two really effective solutions,” Isett said. “First, we spend a lot of effort at PTC reaching out to advertisers who sponsor this kind of content. We try to make sure they do that with full knowledge of precisely what kind of content they’re associating with their corporate brand. Many times, advertisers will back off a particular show. People can participate in that effort through the PTC website.

And second, the same effort is enormously powerful when people communicate on the local level,” Isett told WND. “For example, take Yum Brands, which is Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, KFC, which has historically been a very problematic advertiser – one thing dads can do is go into Taco Bell and tell the local manager, ‘I was going to eat here today, but since you guys sponsored this particular show, I think I’m going to go down the street instead.’ That’s an enormously powerful thing. That’s the American free market at work.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/nefarious-ag ... kQjY7TI.99
SON-cerely,
Nathan Powers

Get exposed to the sun, and get exposed to the Son.
User avatar
natman
Mayor (Site Admin)
 
Posts: 7231
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 3:48 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby natman » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:54 pm

I tend to agree with many of the viewpoints of this above site and those referenced in it, however, when I read this article, I couldn't help but think to myself that the reason that the ratings on these "naked" -based shows dropped is probably because their story lines are not that appealing, not because they include (blurred out) nudity.

After watching the first 10 minutes of any of them the "nudity" becomes so inconsequential that all that remains are the story lines, which, let's face it, are exceedingly dull.
SON-cerely,
Nathan Powers

Get exposed to the sun, and get exposed to the Son.
User avatar
natman
Mayor (Site Admin)
 
Posts: 7231
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 3:48 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby bn2bnude » Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:12 pm

natman wrote:I tend to agree with many of the viewpoints of this above site and those referenced in it, however, when I read this article, I couldn't help but think to myself that the reason that the ratings on these "naked" -based shows dropped is probably because their story lines are not that appealing, not because they include (blurred out) nudity.

After watching the first 10 minutes of any of them the "nudity" becomes so inconsequential that all that remains are the story lines, which, let's face it, are exceedingly dull.

I have never seen the show but I question how they are "soft core porn" if the nudity becomes inconsequential.
So now there is no condemnation for those who belong to Christ Jesus. (Rom 8:1 NLT)



If I speak with the tongues of men and angels but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. (1 Cor 13:1)
User avatar
bn2bnude
Native Resident
 
Posts: 2711
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:09 am
Location: Denver

Re: Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby Petros » Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:57 pm

Well, the question is, is it inconsequential to viewers who are not the likes of us?
The truth, the stark naked truth, the truth without so much as a loincloth on, should surely be the investigator's sole aim - Basil Chamberlain
User avatar
Petros
Native Resident
 
Posts: 5170
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:01 am
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby jasenj1 » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:04 am

natman wrote:"After watching the first 10 minutes of any of them the "nudity" becomes so inconsequential that all that remains are the story lines, which, let's face it, are exceedingly dull."

I have never seen the show but I question how they are "soft core porn" if the nudity becomes inconsequential." (BBCode is off for me for some unknown reason.)

First, the PTC and Dobsons are deep on the "nudity = sex" end of the spectrum. If there's a bare bum or breast it is for sexual stimulation. I notice the article focuses very heavily on "Dating Naked" yet says very little about "Naked and Afraid" while lumping them both into the same basket.

On "Dating Naked" the nudity is clearly part of the courtship and the contestants regularly pair up for sex. There is a clear moral message - get naked and have sex! Yet, even that is tempered by the fact that the nudity does not turn the contestants into rutting animals. Instead it is awkward and becomes secondary to the personalities. From the viewers point of view, there is a heavy voyeur aspect. But I have to believe even that gets boring after watching the people not be sexy for a time.

"Naked and Afraid" is a completely different type of show. Again, there's the voyeur aspect for the audience, but the show is all about surviving and coping with almost complete vulnerability.

I think these shows do have moral messages. And one of them is that simple nudity isn't all that sexy. The world does not come to a screeching halt at the exposure of a bit of flesh. And I think that's a good message. PTC likely does not because nudity is for sex in their opinion.
jasenj1
Native Resident
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby jochanaan » Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:12 am

Well, you can see the article author's agenda with his phrase "blatant nudity." :roll:
You can live your life in fear--or you can live your life.
User avatar
jochanaan
Councillor
 
Posts: 6340
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:58 pm
Location: Denver

Re: Nefarious agenda behind 'naked' TV?

Postby JimShedd112 » Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:07 am

Let's face it, those who create the programs as well as its critics view nudity from a a sexual perspective. And, blurring the "naughty bits" is much like dressing a woman in the skimpiest possible bikini or lingerie. It's intended to provoke sexual thoughts. If full nudity were shown under normal circumstances it'd soon become accepted as mainstream and no big deal, I believe.

Jim Shedd
Jim Shedd
NudistGrandpa
User avatar
JimShedd112
Native Resident
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:44 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada


Return to Isn't nudity just as bad as pornography?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest